The amendments while lifting the ban on cross media ownership also retains the present obligation of the Authority “to ensure that, as far as possible, open and fair competition is facilitated in the operation of more than one channel” and that “undue concentration of media ownership is not created” in any area or in any subject special category of radio TV channels. The bill, however, deletes only the explanation of the above wherein ownership of newspaper or magazine is cited as an example of the undue media concentration. Therefore, through this amendment, while the newspapers is allowed to own more than one media outlet “undue concentration of media ownership” requires PEMRA to act or give the Authority a reason to act, especially against those who might be accused of the same. |