Home
  About Us
  Legal Documents
  Reports
  Media Guides
  Media Freedom Monitor
  Directory
  Web blogs
  News
  Forum
  Guestbook
  Contact Us
 
REPORTS
 
 
Chapter 2: BAD SIGNALS FOR BROADCAST MEDIA
 
   
[ Index ]
 
 

By the time that the World Press Freedom Day, May 3, 2005 , came around, the Pakistan government authorities had tabled a bill in the National Assembly, the lower house of the bicameral parliament, seeking to amend the national broadcast law which, if adopted and approved by both houses of parliament, would signal a new era of greater government control over the airwaves, thus stunting the growth of independent electronic media in the country by reversing their newfound freedoms.

 
     
 

The striking feature about this process is that the changes to the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) Ordinance, 2002, some of which will radically alter the playing field to the detriment of the broadcasters, have been proposed without any formal consultation with the stakeholders – neither were the legislators adequately sensitized about the issues nor were any representatives of the radio or TV sector or consumer and media interest groups invited for their inputs.

 
     
 

The proposed amendments aim to toughen the regulatory regime by blurring the distinction between news media and entertainment media by way of equating broadcasters (who generate original content) with cable channel distributors (who are not media outlets). It is not that PEMRA Ordinance 2002 was too good to be amended; it is just that the progressive development of the broadcast sector may convert to a regression if the changes are approved without a proper debate inside and outside parliament.

 
     
 

Here are some of the salient aspects of the proposed amendment to the broadcast law.

 
 

Arrest and prosecution of broadcasters made easy

 
 

Regulator assumes decisive numerical superiority over broadcasters

 
 
Cross-media ownership made conditional  
 

Surprise raids and forced recovery of arrears

 
 

Cancellation of broadcast license made easy

 
 

Degree of judicial respite for broadcaster reduced

 
 

Content control by regulator enhanced

 
 

Right to freedom of expression as licensing criterion scrapped

 
 

Regulator seeks to be both judge and jury

 
 

Broadcasters stripped of constitutional guarantees

 
 

Fines and penalties on broadcasters increased ten-fold

 
 

Perks and privileges for regulatory allies

 
 

Profiting from regulation of broadcasters

 
       
   
|
|
|